GandGLLP_logo2GandGLLP_logo2GandGLLP_logo2GandGLLP_logo2
  • Home
  • About
  • Expert Areas
    • Banking & Financial Services
    • Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Corporate & Commercial
    • Corporate Restructuring & Insolvency
    • Employment
    • Private Client
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate
  • People
  • Careers
  • International
  • News & Insights
  • Contact
✕

Court clarifies reimbursement obligation in personal injuries actions – Fahy v Padraic Fahy Tiling Contractors Ltd & Anor

December 2021

In a recent High Court case before Justice Twomey, the Court was posed with the question of whether or not a settlement agreement negotiated outside of court can remove the obligation on a Defendant to reimburse the Department of Social Welfare. While this question had been answered in the negative by the Court on a previous occasion, the current case looked to answer whether the situation might be different if one of the Defendants is a State Body

Justice Twomey’s recent High Court ruling provides clarity on the issue of whether the Plaintiff and Defendant in a personal injury action can decide amongst themselves that the Defendant does not have to reimburse the Department of Social Welfare (the “Department”). Typically, when a settlement agreement is reached, the parties decide between themselves how responsible each party should be for the injury. For example, the Defendant might agree to liability of 60% with the remainder of the blame falling to the Plaintiff. The Defendant must then reimburse the Department in proportion to their liability.

In the present case, the Department had paid out €42,000 to the Plaintiff and the parties were requesting that the Court incorporate a term from their settlement agreement into the Court Order stating that the Defendant did not have to reimburse the Department irrespective of their liability. This issue had previously been dealt with by Justice Twomey in Szwarc v. Hanford Commercial t/a Maldron Hotel Wexford [2021] IEHC 474 (“Szwarc”) and here the Court refused to find that terms included in private settlements could be included in an Order of the Court. The Court stated that including such a term in a Court Order would result in the taxpayer paying for the Defendant’s financial liability to the State. The parties argued that the present case differed from Szwarc as the Second-Named Defendant, The Health Service Executive (“HSE”) is a State Body. They argued that unlike in Szwarc where the Defendant was an insurance company, if the HSE did not reimburse the Department, this would not create a loss for the taxpayer but that it would merely transfer the loss from one State Body to another.

Despite the submissions by the parties, the Court refused to allow the term in the settlement agreement to form part of the Court Order. One of the main reasons for doing so was because the term had not been decided by an independent observer (the Court) and the parties to the settlement agreement had a vested financial interest in the term being included. The Court was also heavily persuaded by the fact that including the term would have a negative financial impact on a third party who did not have an opportunity to be heard during the course of the settlement negotiations. Judge Twomey also held that the HSE should not be treated differently to insurance companies. The Court did not find that the distinction was relevant and noted that although the HSE and The Department are State Bodies, they nonetheless have their own separate budgets and financial interests and to assume that they are one and the same is inaccurate.

Justice Twomey’s decision makes it clear that Defendants to an action must always reimburse the Department in proportion to their liability unless otherwise decided by a court. This decision has not made any significant changes to the law, nonetheless, it strongly reiterates the position that Defendants who wish to settle an action, must take into account their liability to the Department when negotiating a settlement figure.

CONTACT

+353 1 872 9299
Lawyer@GoreGrimes.ie

ADDRESS

Gore & Grimes Solicitors LLP
Three Haddington Buildings
Percy Place
Dublin 4
D04 T253
Ireland

Gore & Grimes Solicitors LLP is authorised by the Legal Services Regulatory Authority to operate as a Limited Liability Partnership pursuant to section 125 of the Legal Services Regulation Act 2015.

© Gore and Grimes 2025 Privacy Notice  Cookie Policy Site by Begley Hutton

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie settingsACCEPT REJECT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Always Enabled
These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-advertisement1 yearSet by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie is used to record the user consent for the cookies in the "Advertisement" category .
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
CookieLawInfoConsent1 yearCookieYes sets this cookie to store the user consent.
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Analytical or Performance Cookies
These allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works, for example, by ensuring that users are finding what they are looking for easily.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga1 year 1 month 4 daysThe _ga cookie, installed by Google Analytics, calculates visitor, session and campaign data and also keeps track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookie stores information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to recognize unique visitors.
_gat_gtag_UA_*1 minuteGoogle Analytics sets this cookie to store a unique user ID.
_gid1 dayInstalled by Google Analytics, _gid cookie stores information on how visitors use a website, while also creating an analytics report of the website's performance. Some of the data that are collected include the number of visitors, their source, and the pages they visit anonymously.
CONSENT2 yearsYouTube sets this cookie via embedded youtube-videos and registers anonymous statistical data.
Advertisement
These cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns.
CookieDurationDescription
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE5 months 27 daysA cookie set by YouTube to measure bandwidth that determines whether the user gets the new or old player interface.
YSCsessionYSC cookie is set by Youtube and is used to track the views of embedded videos on Youtube pages.
yt-remote-connected-devicesneverYouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video.
yt-remote-device-idneverYouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video.
Save & Accept
Powered by CookieYes Logo